In Bhutan this is a debate that will last forever – because it quickly delves into religious sentiments, and that’s too deep, and too personal to arrive at a solution that suits all.
To eat or not to eat meat, in my view, is a personal question and not an ethical, or moral issue. Likewise, the government, as a political entity, should be allowed to do its job – as in how best Bhutanese can access meat. Everything beyond it, at best, is hypocritical.
I turned vegetarian over twelves years back. It was purely a personal decision – with no religion or health issues involved. Of course, there were encouragements from different quarters including a rimpoche-friend who advocates against eating meat. But let me share one good reason, perhaps, that made me take the final step.
While attending a Buddhist conference in Kathmandu, a panellist asked the audience, “Do you know what you are eating? Do you know where your food come from?” And the most insidious of the questions: Do you know what the animal there are fed?
Now her question reminded me of some horrendous things I saw in slaughterhouses across the border – decades back. And really, back then it didn’t strike me anything. Maybe I was too naïve or too insensitive. But in recent years, besides becoming more spiritual, I have also heard more horrible stories of animal feeds being used in these farms.
Then, at a more personal level, there was also the fact that I was homing in to 50 and I felt that my body didn’t require meat anymore. I guess I have enough storage of essential vitamins like B12 that come from red meat. It does not leave our body like potassium or magnesium. We don’t run the risk of B12 deficiency easily. So I thought if I don’t need it why have some animals slaughtered, which brings me to the question of what Buddhism says about it.
What buddhist scriptures say.
From the few readings that I made, the confusion seems to have started off with the monks in Gautama Buddha’s sangha itself. They depended on the generosity of lay supporters as they went on their morning rounds for food alms. Obviously, they couldn’t dictate what people offered. In a predominantly Hindu India, people only refrained from eating beef but not other types of meat or fish. So the monks would face a simple choice – eat meat or starve.
This dilemma became worse in the Tibetan highlands where no grass grew, and where green vegetable is in short supply.
Furthermore, Mahayana and Vajarayana Buddhism are less dogmatic than Theravada and leave this critical decision to personal choices that you can make based on your tawa (right view). So if the intention is to survive, it is OK. But if the kill is for greed, anger or jealousy, it is not ok anymore.
Going back to Buddha, what do the scriptures say?
A line from Dhammapada V130 reads,
“All tremble at the rod. All hold their life dear. Drawing the parallel to yourself, Neither kill nor get others to kill.”
So, what should we do (as Buddhist, if I may say)? Be practical. Well, just as people adopted to eating meat for practical reasons to stay alive, if one could do that by staying away from meat, then just do it. And do some readings, talk to doctors, get your vitamin level tested.
If you are not a toddler and if you are getting your protein and B12 from other sources, you are in pretty good shape, and chances are that you don’t require meat at all. And take small steps. I stopped eating pork and then after a month I stopped beef and few months later, chicken. Don’t be over ambitious.
By the way, I am the only one in my family who stopped eating meat. I still eat fish and eggs. As said, I have not been coerced by anyone to stop meat nor would I force anyone to do that either. The choice should be personal and should come from within – from what it feels good. Only then it sustains.
#veganism





























